Friday, July 23, 2004
Historical Political Correctness
now that the 9/11 white wash papers have been published it should be said by others who are not historical fabricators that
it is clear that clinton and his cohorts should share most of the blame along with congress for the failure that led to the 9/11 scenario. clinton though caved into (or created himself) such a feel good politically correct atmosphere that it became impossible to act in a strong manner against bin laden. it goes with the whole idea of it being better to look good than feel good. simple math is fairly clear, he was in office eight years and thus had the time to take proper actions against bin laden and the merry pranksters. instead clinton allowed the terrrorists attacks to continue their rampant escalation leading to the bombings which should have been deemed an act of war in kenya & tanzania.
the following is a scathing article about clinton intel and its failures from the national review posted in april of 2003. note if you will the information regarding sandy berger's failures also, particularly interesting considering what has happened the past week:
http://www.nationalreview.com/nr_comment/nr_comment042903.asp
so let me understand this correctly, sandy berger putting documents inside his socks was because of sloppiness? what did he forget to use foot powder that morning? interesting how the docs pertain to clinton's handling of al-qada.also interesting that berger was working for kerry also until he resigned this week when some of his follies (high crimes possibly?) have been exposed.....well, i am sure that there is nothing to it, afterall they are democrats and surely only doing what is good for america
and as bill clinton seemed to suggest this week - america should just laugh along.....
it is clear that clinton and his cohorts should share most of the blame along with congress for the failure that led to the 9/11 scenario. clinton though caved into (or created himself) such a feel good politically correct atmosphere that it became impossible to act in a strong manner against bin laden. it goes with the whole idea of it being better to look good than feel good. simple math is fairly clear, he was in office eight years and thus had the time to take proper actions against bin laden and the merry pranksters. instead clinton allowed the terrrorists attacks to continue their rampant escalation leading to the bombings which should have been deemed an act of war in kenya & tanzania.
the following is a scathing article about clinton intel and its failures from the national review posted in april of 2003. note if you will the information regarding sandy berger's failures also, particularly interesting considering what has happened the past week:
http://www.nationalreview.com/nr_comment/nr_comment042903.asp
so let me understand this correctly, sandy berger putting documents inside his socks was because of sloppiness? what did he forget to use foot powder that morning? interesting how the docs pertain to clinton's handling of al-qada.also interesting that berger was working for kerry also until he resigned this week when some of his follies (high crimes possibly?) have been exposed.....well, i am sure that there is nothing to it, afterall they are democrats and surely only doing what is good for america
and as bill clinton seemed to suggest this week - america should just laugh along.....
// posted by Zevchi @ 12:59 AM 
